An Anketa poll recorded 231 votes on what should change following Georgi Kuzev’s killing. Under “Justice for Georgi — Part 3,” it asked what needed to change, allowing up to three choices about law enforcement, family responsibility, education, and preventing violence.
Equal application of the law was the leading choice, at 20%.
Kuzev, 37, was attacked on Youth Hill in Plovdiv on August 4, 2026, and later died in hospital. The prosecutor’s office confirmed the death and opened a murder investigation.
An earlier Anketa poll recorded 824 votes, with 60% supporting revenge in a scenario where they would face no punishment. That hypothetical condition matters. The current question concerns proposed changes, and the two polls cannot establish that the same people changed their minds.
The poll’s introduction raises concerns about missed warning signs, weakened family and school authority, institutional mistrust, and violent online ideologies. This poll measures selected priorities, not whether institutions actually failed or whether a proposed measure would prevent another killing. The reported percentages use the total voting base. Because up to three choices were allowed, support for different proposals could overlap.
Applying the law equally, regardless of power, money, or status, led at 20%.
Accountability for corruption and crime cover-ups by police, prosecutors, or courts received 14%. Consequences for repeated aggression and less serious crimes also received 14%. Greater parental responsibility for children’s behavior and upbringing followed at 13%.
Restoring teachers’ authority and protecting them from improper parental pressure received 11%. Early action against racism, neo-Nazism, extreme nationalism, and online radicalization received 10%. Faster, convincing state responses to reports of sexual assault and violence received 9%, as did education in responsibility, respect, empathy, and the rule of law. “Cannot decide” displayed 0%.
These figures describe the available results rather than a confirmed final outcome. Recruitment, weighting, and repeat-vote controls are not documented. The data do not establish national representativeness or provide demographic answer breakdowns. Rounded percentages cannot establish exact counts, and a displayed zero need not mean no selections.
Equal application of the law led the two next-ranked options by six percentage points on the displayed figures. The choices connect the question of justice with institutional accountability and responses to harmful behavior. They do not explain individual motives or identify which proposals were selected together. For someone reporting violence or raising a child, these proposals concern how protection and responsibility might work before harm escalates.
The clearest finding is a leading preference for equal application of the law among the available proposals. It was the top choice, rather than a majority position.
Read also
Do men cheat more than women? It’s a question that can spark arguments about trust, relationships, and gender. But when the question was put to voters on Anketa, a narrow...
An Anketa poll that recorded 824 votes posed a brutal question: if you stood in front of the people found guilty of killing Georgi Kuzev and knew you would face...
